Scots Catholic
Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
Calling Scotland's 841,000 Catholics to unite as one voice
Scots Catholic Blog
Blog
Scots support reduced abortion time limits and statutory waiting period
| Posted on May 24, 2017 at 5:29 AM |
comments (456)
|
 A new poll out today (Sunday 21 May) shows that most people
(60%) would like to see time limits for abortions reduced, among women the
figure is 70%. ComRes interviewed 2,008 British adults online between 12th and
14th May 2017. Data was weighted to be representative of all GB adults. 61% of Scottish respondents opposed any moves towards making
it mandatory for doctors to have to participate in abortion procedures against
their will, while 51% oppose moves to compel pharmacists to prescribe a pill
against their will, if they believe that pill will end the life of an unborn
child. The poll also showed overwhelming support (76%) for the
proposal that doctors, should “verify in person that a patient seeking an
abortion is not under pressure from a third party to undergo the abortion”. 65%
oppose tax-payer money being spent on abortions overseas, while 82% of Scots
believe, the law should require a waiting period of five days between an
initial consultation with a doctor and an abortion taking place, in order to
ensure that the mother has had enough time to consider all of the options
available to her. Responding to the findings, Archbishop Philip Tartaglia,
President of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland said; “This weekend (20/21 May) in parishes across Scotland a
letter from the Catholic Bishops will be read at all Masses, urging voters to
engage with our democracy and to remember that human life at every stage of
development is precious and must be protected. As we remind our politicians
that abortion is always morally unacceptable, it is heartening to see that a
majority of our fellow citizens do not support the current abortion laws.” Archbishop Tartaglia added: “I welcome the fact that not only is there no demand for
time limits to be raised but 70% of women would like to see them reduced, that
82% of Scots would like to see a statutory waiting period introduced after a
consultation and before an abortion takes place and that over half of Scottish
respondents do not believe that doctors (61%) or pharmacists (51%) should be
compelled to participate in abortion procedures.” “These findings are both sobering and heartening, they
undermine the shrill calls of the so-called pro-choice movement that abortion
laws should be loosened. They send a powerful message to Scotland’s politicians
at a time when the Scottish Parliament has been given control over this
legislation and they remind us that the pro-life cause is alive and well in our
country.” The poll results have been released to coincide with the
launch of the “Where Do They Stand” website. The site will allow voters, to find
out where your local candidates stand on life issues - abortion, assisted
suicide and embryo research - by visiting www.wheredotheystand.org.uk Headline results • Only 1% want the abortion time limit raised to birth • 70% of women would like the current time limit for
abortion to be lowered. • 59% of women would like the abortion time limit lowered to
16 weeks or lower. • 65% oppose UK taxpayer money being spent on abortions
overseas. • 93% of women want independent abortion counselling
introduced. • 91% of women want a sex-selective abortion ban. • 79% of general population want a five-day consideration
period before abortion. • 84% of women want improved pregnancy support for women in
crisis. • 76% of population want introduction of doctors verifying
women not coerced. • 70% of parents want introduction of parental consent for
girls 15 and under to get abortions. Results by question Parental or guardian consent should be required for girls
aged 15 or under to undergo an abortion • 65% general population agree (21% disagree) (“just under
⅔”) • 70% of parents with children 18 or under in household
agree (16% disagree) • 73% Conservative voters agree (16% disagree) Doctors should be required by new legislation to verify in
person that a patient seeking an abortion is not under pressure from a third
party to undergo the abortion • 76% general population agree (11% disagree) • 77% females agree (11% disagree) • 77% 18-24 age agree (12% disagree) • 81% Conservative voters agree (10% disagree) In Great Britain the upper time limit for abortion is 24
weeks or approximately six months' gestation. By comparison, in most other EU
countries the limit for most abortions is 12 weeks or lower. In light of this
difference what do you think the time limit should be in Britain? • General population o 1% - It should be extended to birth o 1% - It should be extended above 24 weeks o 20% - It should remain at 24 weeks o 10% - It should be reduced to 20 weeks o 17% - It should be reduced to 16 weeks o 21% - It should be reduced to 12 weeks (biggest group) o 12% - It should be reduced to below 12 weeks • Females o 1% - It should be extended to birth o 1% - It should be extended above 24 weeks o 17% - It should remain at 24 weeks o 11% - It should be reduced to 20 weeks o 18% - It should be reduced to 16 weeks o 24% - It should be reduced to 12 weeks (biggest group) o 17% - It should be reduced to below 12 weeks • Political o It should be extended to birth §
Below 1% - Labour o It should be reduced to 20 weeks or lower § 60%
- Conservatives § 60%
- Labour § 65%
- Liberal Democrats • Parents with children 18 or under in household agree o 69% - It should be reduced to 20 weeks or lower Where a doctor believes abortion to be the intentional
killing of a human being, would you support or oppose the Government making it
mandatory for doctors to have to participate in abortion procedures against
their will, if they want to remain in their profession? • 56% general population oppose (22% don’t know, 22%
support) “only 1/5 of the population support” • 61% Scottish oppose (23% don’t know, 15% support) • 66% of Liberal Democrat voters oppose (19% don’t know, 16%
disagree) In your opinion, would you support or oppose requiring a
pharmacist to prescribe a pill against their will, if they believe that pill
will end the life of an unborn child? • 45% oppose (23% don’t know, 32% support) • 51% Scottish oppose (22% don’t know, 27% support) Over the past five years, abortion provider Marie Stopes
International have been given more than £160 million of taxpayer money to spend
overseas, some of which has been used directly to fund abortions. Do you
support or oppose tax-payer money going to fund abortions overseas? • General population o 65% oppose tax-payer money being spent on abortions
overseas (20% support) § 46%
oppose and feel this money would be better spent back in the UK on other
Government priorities § 19%
oppose and feel this money should be instead spent on other areas of need in
developing countries such as basic health care and education • Political o 79% Conservatives oppose tax-payer money being spent on
abortions overseas In the Netherlands, the law requires a waiting period of
five days between an initial consultation with a doctor and an abortion taking
place, in order to ensure that the mother has had enough time to consider all
of the options available to her. To what extent, if at all, do you agree or
disagree that in this respect British law should be brought into line with the
Netherlands? • 79% general population agree (12% disagree) • 82% Scottish agree (8% disagree) A woman considering abortion should have a legal right to
independent counselling from a source that has no financial interest in her
decision. • 89% general population agree (4% disagree) • 93% women agree (2% disagree) Women who want to continue with their pregnancies, but are
under financial pressure to have an abortion, should be given more support to
help them through their crisis • 79% general population agree (10% disagree) • 84% women agree (7% disagree) • Younger cohorts have highest support o 18-24 - 84% o 35-44 - 83% o 45-54 - 81% o 55-64 - 74% o 65+ - 76% • 86% of parents with children 18 or under in household
agree (7% disagree) • 90% of Labour supporters agree (4% disagree) Aborting babies because of their gender should be explicitly
banned by the law • 89% general population agree (5% disagree) • 91% females agree (4% disagree) • 93% Scottish agree (4% disagree) ComRes is a member of the British Polling Council and abides
by its rules. This text was taken from the Catholic Parliamentary Office Facebook page. |
Catholic Bishops call for faithful to reflect on beauth and goodness of Church teaching ahead of General Election
| Posted on May 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM |
comments (23)
|
 In a pastoral letter which will be read at all 500
Catholic churches in Scotland this weekend (20/21 May) Scotland's Catholic
Bishops, will urge parishioners to participate in the 2017 General Election and
to be informed by the teachings of the Church. The detailed statement will invite Catholic voters to consider a number of key issues ahead of casting their vote at the election on June 8th. Commenting on the letter, the Director of the Catholic
Parliamentary Office, Anthony Horan said; “This General election provides an
opportunity for Catholics to take their beliefs into the polling station and
elect members of parliament who share their concerns.” The full text of the letter is as follows: This General Election presents us with an opportunity to
reflect on Catholic social teaching. As Christians, we have a civic and moral
duty to engage with our democracy. As Catholics, we believe that the primary
goal of society should be the common good; that is the good of all people and
of the whole person. Indeed, the common good is the very reason political
authority exists. This election provides an opportunity to reflect on the
beauty and goodness of Church teaching and to keep that teaching at the forefront
of our minds as we engage with candidates across all parties. During elections,
a range of issues compete for your attention; we highlight some of them here in
the hope that you will reflect on them and raise them with your candidates. Human Life Human life at every stage of development is precious and
must be protected. Any laws which permit
the wilful ending of life must always be rejected as reprehensible and unjust.
We must create a culture of life where the most vulnerable are valued and their
dignity respected. The undeniable value of human life, created in the image and
likeness of God, is fundamental to the Catholic faith. We should remind our
politicians that abortion, assisted suicide and euthanasia are always morally
unacceptable. Marriage and the Family Society relies on the building block of the family to
exist. The love of man and woman in marriage and their openness to new life is
the very basic cell upon which society is built. The wellbeing of society
depends on the flourishing and health of family life and those in authority
should respond to this with policies that create economic and other advantages
for families with children. Poverty Sadly, poverty continues to be a scourge for many at home
and abroad. Too many people still struggle to make ends meet. This sad reality
cannot and should not endure in our country in the twenty-first century. Our
concerns should also extend to providing international assistance, while
ensuring that aid is not used to support immoral practices such as those which
compromise the basic right to life. Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigration The United
Kingdom should be a place where the most vulnerable are welcomed and given the
resources necessary to rebuild their lives. At the same time, we should provide
for those people living in and around conflict zones, and commit to working
towards the peaceful resolution of conflict. Living in Europe There are millions of EU citizens living in the UK and
millions of UK citizens living across the EU.
Mindful of the uncertainty affecting them, candidates should commit to
working towards delivering stability and security for them in future. Our politicians should forge and renew
international partnerships and establish rights for those who wish to work in
the UK, in a spirit of cooperation and friendship. Freedom of Religion and Conscience Millions of people worldwide are persecuted for their
beliefs. People of faith, including Christians, should be able to freely
practise their faith and bear witness to it in their lives, without fear of
prejudice, intolerance, abuse or violence. Candidates should be committed to
the right of people not to be forced to act against their conscience. Nuclear Weapons and the Arms Trade The use of any weapon that causes more than individual
and proportionate harm to civilians is immoral and, thus, rejected by the
Church. The use of weapons of mass destruction is a serious crime against God
and against humanity. While states are entitled to possess the means required
for legitimate defence, this must not become an excuse for an excessive
accumulation of weaponry which becomes a considerable threat to stability and
freedom. Respectful Politics Often, politicians are tempted to score points or resort
to insults. We need politicians who are willing to change this and to take
politics in a new direction, where dialogue is respectful, and where different
points of view, including those of a religious nature, are tolerated. As we cast our votes this election, let us bear in mind
the words of Pope Francis when he said, “The greatness of any nation is
revealed in its effective care of society’s most vulnerable members.” Our
nation, our Parliament, and our Government will be judged on how it treats its
poorest and most vulnerable citizens. Yours devotedly in Christ, Philip Tartaglia, President, Archbishop of Glasgow Leo
Cushley, Archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh Joseph Toal,
Vice-President, Bishop of Motherwell Hugh Gilbert, Episcopal Secretary,
Bishop of Aberdeen Stephen Robson, Bishop of Dunkeld John Keenan,
Bishop of Paisley William Nolan, Bishop of Galloway Brian McGee,
Bishop of Argyll and the Isles |
Vice President Mike Pence tells pro-life campaigners that 'life is winning' in America
| Posted on January 27, 2017 at 3:44 PM |
comments (31)
|
 Mike Pence at March for LifeToday Vice President Mike Pence spoke to hundreds of thousands of pro-life advocates gathered for the annual March for Life on the National Mall. He is the first Vice President to address the March in person. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway also spoke at today’s March. Vice President Pence’s remarks reflected his deep roots in the pro-life movement and the Trump-Pence Administration’s commitments to the right to life cause:
Kellyanne Conway said:
Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, onsite at the March for Life, offered the following comment in response:
|
Pope Francis claims gender theory is the ‘great enemy of marriage today’
| Posted on October 6, 2016 at 6:03 AM |
comments (0)
|
 Pope
Francis has spoken out against the theory of gender, something he has stated as
being the “great enemy of marriage today”.
The pope, speaking to a group of religious men and women in Tbilisi,
Georgia, said: “Today, there is a global war trying to destroy marriage…they
don’t destroy it with weapons, but with ideas.
It’s certain ideological ways of thinking that are destroying it…we have
to defend ourselves from ideological colonisation.” The
pontiff has often spoken about ideological colonisation and gender theory and
the dangers they pose to society. The
ideological colonisation he refers to is primarily to do with developed
countries – mainly in the West – imposing their ideas and values into
developing nations and potentially withholding aid where those ideas and values
are resisted. Gender theory, on the
other hand, is what an individual person believes himself or herself to be and
it may not necessarily correspond with their biological sex. Indeed, it may even be non-binary; that is, neither
male nor female. The next day, during an in-flight press conference on his way home
to Rome, the pope spoke once more about gender theory and expressed deep
concern about “teaching in school about this [gender theory], to change mentalities.” This, he says, “is what I call ideological
colonisation.” He then spoke more specifically about homosexuality and the
pastoral call of the Church with regard to people who experience same-sex
attraction. He said: “First of all, I’ve
accompanied in my life as a priest, a bishop, and even as pope, people with
homosexual tendencies or even homosexual practices, I’ve led them closer to the
Lord.” He called on all people within
the Church to accompany people in such situations “as Jesus accompanies”
because “when a person who has this condition gets in front of Jesus, Jesus won’t
say ‘leave because you’re homosexual.’” The pope was, however, cautious about the more liberal headlines
that have been attributed to him in terms of a possibly softer Church attitude
towards homosexual acts when he said: “I want to be clear, this is a problem of
morals. It’s a problem. It’s a human problem that has to be resolved
as it can, always with God’s mercy.” |
Truth is the essential pre-condition to democracy, writes George Weigel
| Posted on September 27, 2016 at 9:07 AM |
comments (0)
|
 George Weigel, the Distinguished Senior Fellow of the
Ethics and Public Policy Center, has claimed that democracy is likely to become
brittle, crack and fail unless society consists of “men and women committed to
the dignity of the human person as the first principle of just governance and
dedicated to the pursuit of the common good.”
Weigel, in response to the assertion that those who
believe that truths about the human person and human community are essential to
democracy are actually on an authoritarian mission, says: “it is the radical
moral relativists for whom there is no “truth,” but only expressions of
personal preference and will, who are busily enforcing their judgments on
society in the name of “tolerance”.” At 7pm on Tuesday October 4th, George Weigel is speaking
at St Mary’s Metropolitan Cathedral in Edinburgh on the topic of
"Converting the Culture: The New Evangelisation and the Future of the
West”. Read the full article in The Scotsman here: http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/is-faith-the-missing-ingredient-that-can-make-western-democracy-work-1-4240413 |
Bishops call for ‘decisive and courageous steps’ towards nuclear disarmament
| Posted on July 12, 2016 at 8:57 AM |
comments (16)
|
 The eight Catholic Bishops of ScotlandStatement of the Catholic Bishops of Scotland on nuclear weapons: The Bishops of Scotland have for a long time pointed out the immorality of the use of strategic nuclear weapons due to the indiscriminate destruction of innocent human life that their use would cause. The renewal of Trident is questioned not just by those concerned with the morality of nuclear weapons themselves but also by those concerned about the use of scarce financial resources. Lives are being lost now because money that could be spent on the needy and the poor is tied up in nuclear arsenals. We endorse the words of Pope Francis: “Spending on nuclear weapons squanders the wealth of nations”. The United Kingdom, permanent member of the UN Security Council and declared nuclear power, signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968. That treaty binds signatories who do not have nuclear weapons not to acquire them, but it also binds those who do have nuclear weapons to work towards the disposing and elimination of all nuclear weapons. Britain should take more decisive and courageous steps to revive that aspect of the treaty and not seek to prolong the status quo. Signed + Philip Tartaglia, President of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland, Archbishop of Glasgow+ Joseph Toal, Vice-President, Bishop of Motherwell+ Hugh Gilbert, Episcopal Secretary, Bishop of Aberdeen+ Leo Cushley, Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh+ Stephen Robson, Bishop of Dunkeld+ John Keenan, Bishop of Paisley+ William Nolan, Bishop of Galloway+ Brian McGee, Bishop of Argyll and The Isles |
Dr Halliday Sutherland and the fight against eugenics
| Posted on June 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM |
comments (100)
|
 If only there were more Dr Halliday Sutherlands today. Perhaps he would have the courage to stand up
for the rights of those who are under threat from the increasing prevalence of
assisted suicide in our world. Perhaps
he would have the courage to stand up for the rights of the preborn child under
threat of death by abortion. Dr Halliday Sutherland, born in Glasgow in 1882, was a man
who stood up for the people society felt unworthy of life. He lived in a time when the middle and upper
classes of Britain fought for the legal right to sterilise the poor and the
seemingly unworthy. The rich felt more
and more threatened by the higher birth rate among the poorer classes compared
to their deteriorating birth rate. They
also felt threatened by the seeming prevalence of tuberculosis among the poor. There was even talk of using a lethal chamber
at one stage. According to this article,
Sutherland was “appalled by the popularity of eugenics among Britain’s middle
and upper classes” and set about fighting for the rights of the vulnerable. He argued with the Professor of Eugenics at
London University who claimed that tuberculosis was primarily caused by
heredity and argued that the disease be cured by breeding out those considered
to be at risk (the poor). In a speech
made in 1917, Sutherland called Britain’s eugenists “race breeders with the
souls of cattle breeders” and argued that “in preventing disease you are not
preserving the weak but conserving the strong.”
Sutherland also decried the actions of a eugenist who, in
1921, began dispensing ‘pro-race’ contraceptives to women in poorer parts of
London. Sutherland described this as a
social “experiment” that would lead to a “servile state”. He also argued that ‘if ordinary Britons were
legally prevented from having children, they would have no societal role other
than to work.’ Marie Stopes was also criticised by Sutherland after she
revealed her eugenic vision for society in 1921. She revealed details of her “ardent dream” of
“human stock represented only by well-formed, desired and well-endowed
beautiful men and women.” The dangers of
this frightening and callous point of view are obvious. Halliday Sutherland would be appalled at the direction of travel
of western society today. Not only have
we cow-towed to the contraceptive mentality, completely ignoring any notion of
the true meaning of our sexuality, but we now routinely kill our own preborn
children through abortion and threaten the vulnerable with a premature death by
way of assisted suicide. We need more Halliday Sutherlands in our world today. We need more people to stand up for the poor,
the marginalised, and the vulnerable. Dr
Sutherland was a Catholic and it is important that we as a Church follow his
example and be absolutely clear on the wrongs of abortion and assisted
suicide. Not only that, but we must also
resist the assumption that contraception is a simple and harmless solution that
allows people to have sexual relations without the ‘threat’ of new life. As a Catholic people we value life from the
very moment it starts right up until its natural conclusion on death. Contraception interrupts the natural process
by killing off new life. It also
encourages people to use others as objects of desire, their sole purpose being
to satisfy their own selfish cravings devoid of the threat of responsibility for
a new life. We have lost the true meaning of the sexual encounter and we
have lost the meaning of the value of life.
Our world needs to hear that there is an alternative to the throwaway
culture of death; an alternative that values all life and that gives the sexual
act the respect it truly deserves. Dr
Halliday Sutherland would be willing to speak up for these values. |
Jo Cox death should herald a turning point in public/political relations
| Posted on June 20, 2016 at 11:43 AM |
comments (55)
|
 Jo Cox in the House of CommonsThe death of Labour MP Jo Cox has shocked not only the world
of politics in which she worked, but also the British nation as a whole. The horror of what happened in the town of Birstall
last Thursday will be a permanent scar for the MP’s family and is something
they will have to live with for the rest of their lives. But what does it mean for the relationship between MPs and
the general public? Scottish Secretary
David Mundell, who has himself received death threats, lamented the influence
of social media in relations between the public and MPs, criticising the
“vitriol” that is often expressed towards politicians. I for one agree with him. Whilst our elected representatives’ role in
public life is such that they are very much open to criticism, that criticism
should be constructive and measured, and it should be expressed with
politeness. It should not be unjust or
whimsical, and it should not be expressed with any degree of hatred or be
threatening in any way. Politicians have
the right to do their job in safety and without abuse. Isn’t that the legal right of every
worker? Why should politicians be any
different? Very few politicians are actually in the job to make people
worse off or to act selfishly. They are
in politics because they genuinely want to make a difference. Yes, there will be bad apples in there; just
like there is in any walk of life. But
as with any bad apple, we need to pray for them and we need to trust that our
peaceful system of democracy will ultimately win the day. The hate directed at poor Jo Cox as she walked through her
constituency last week was of the worst kind.
It took her life and has thus
caused immeasurable pain to her family, friends and colleagues. But underneath all of that is an unhealthy
undercurrent of hate and cynicism which exists throughout our country and is often
directed at many in officialdom, including politicians. This is especially the case on social media, where the abuse and hatred spewed forth has the potential to fuel the anger in certain individuals predisposed to dangerous actions. Jesus Christ called us to love all people;
even those that we perceive to be our enemies.
Our politicians need our support and prayers. They work in an incredibly testing
environment in which they are under increasing fear for their own safety and
wellbeing. May the sad and unnecessary passing of Jo Cox herald a
change in attitude across our nation so that we come together as one, and in a
spirit of brotherly love may we work with and support our politicians in
striving for peace, equality, tolerance and prosperity for all people. |
Archbishop offers Scotland a path to the common good
| Posted on June 9, 2016 at 6:23 AM |
comments (0)
|
 Archbishop of St Andrews
and Edinburgh Leo Cushley celebrates the 125 anniversary of Pope
Leo XIII’s landmark encyclical ‘Rerum Novarum’ Archbishop Leo Cushley has marked the 125
anniversary of the papal encyclical Rerum Novarum by re-proposing its social
teaching for the common good of Scottish society. The encyclical by Pope Leo XIII is arguably
the Church’s most important when it comes to social justice and the Archbishop
can clearly see positives in once again bringing it to the forefront of our
minds. Writing in today's Scotsman Archbishop Cushley said: “At the foundation of Pope Leo’s
vision is an unshakeable belief in the intrinsic value of every man, woman and
child. The degree to which it threatened
or enhanced the life and dignity of the human person”, he says, “is the measure
of any political, moral or economic order”.
It is clear, therefore, that the encyclical has at its very core the
belief that human life must be at the centre of all decisions made by
authority. It is about standing shoulder
to shoulder with the most vulnerable in society, including the poor, the sick,
the elderly, and the unborn. Pope Leo, who rejected unbridled capitalism as well as state
socialism, argued that neither central government nor larger society should
substitute itself for the initiative and responsibility of individuals and
intermediary bodies within civil society.
Archbishop Cushley cited the example of Fife, which has gone from having
82 councils in 1930 to just one today, to illustrate the renewed appetite to
revisit the issue of local empowerment. The Archbishop also referred to the importance of the family
in society. He said: “The twofold
purpose of this [the family] micro-community is traditionally defined as the
good of the spouses and the procreation and education of children. For this reason, nearly all societies – not just
those informed by Christianity – have founded family life upon marriage. Even now, the best sociological evidence
tends to suggest that children generally do best in life when they grow up with
a mum and a dad who are married to each other.
The married family, if you like, is the first, best and cheapest
department of health, welfare and education.”
He then quoted Pope John Paul II as he tried to encapsulate the effect
of the erosion of a marriage-based culture: “As the family goes, so goes the
nation, and so goes the whole world in which we live.” However, the Archbishop also referred to Pope Francis’ call
to appreciate those people for whom the ideal family is not possible, saying
that these people “achieve remarkable things in the most difficult of
circumstances”. He then reiterated Pope
Francis’ call to sympathise with and support those in difficult circumstances. In a world fraught with significant challenges to the family
as we know it, the Archbishop’s consideration of one of the great social
encyclicals is timely. As he said: “The
Church does not seek to impose its social teaching upon Scottish society. We can only propose it as our vision to
anybody seeking new paths towards the common good.” Archbishop Cushley has proposed what he feels is the
fundamental consideration for the common good of society and offered it to the
people of Scotland. It is now up to us lay Catholics
to do the same. Click this link to read the Scotsman article: http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/archbishop-leo-cushley-no-imposition-just-the-church-s-vision-1-4149785 |
Scottish Government recognises value of the unborn child
| Posted on June 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM |
comments (0)
|
 Nicola Sturgeon appreciating the beauty of new life It is wonderful to hear Scotland’s First Minister Nicola
Sturgeon announce that, from Spring 2017, all pregnant women will receive free
vitamins in order to help give their children the best possible start in life. In addition to making vitamins freely available the Scottish
Government will also be introducing the following initiatives:
Ms Sturgeon said that “every child deserves a fair and equal
chance and offering all pregnant women vitamins sends a strong signal that,
right from the very start of life, we are doing all we can to help. There is strong evidence that taking vitamins
in pregnancy improves both the mother and baby’s health and providing free
vitamins, to all pregnant women, has the widespread support of healthcare
professionals.” Any government policy which seeks to assist women in
pregnancy to look after both themselves and their baby must be welcomed. It is a positive step by the Scottish
government and it is hoped that many people will benefit from the new
initiatives. The introduction of free vitamins for all pregnant women is real
and positive recognition by the Scottish Government of the importance of the
unborn child. The unborn child should
be entitled to the same rights as any born child and this must include the
right to the best possible health care and treatment. While the rights of the unborn child are not
yet fully protected in our country, primarily because of the availability of
abortion, this type of initiative is a step in the right direction; a small but
important step towards equality of rights for all children, irrespective of whether they happen
to be inside or outside of the womb. Click this link to read more about the new initiative: ttp://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/All-pregnant-women-to-receive-vitamins-251d.aspx |